Whenever I am in a conversation in which I have to explain China, I usually tell people that China has its own America, 400 million or so strong, who represent an upper and middle class with the same living standards and luxuries as the United States. They constitute China’s vast number of Internet users. But beneath this layer there exist another billion who live in abject poverty and are expected to supply the grueling labor to build and maintain this second America. Finally, I have found a thinker who has used similar words:
China, it is often said, has more than 400 million Internet users and hundreds of millions of new urban residents, who are changing the face of the country. It is less often noted that China also has another billion people who have not yet been fully included in these new economic and social changes.
China’s Other Billion: A Million Deng Yujiaos | China Digital Times (CDT).
Rachel’s personal China blog can be found at:
From the mid-Renaissance until the late Eighteenth Century, when the British began selling opium through the port city of Canton, China devoured the world’s currency. All of the silver from Spanish Peru made its way to the Middle Kingdom. The aristocratic houses of Europe, as well as the growing ranks of the bourgeoisie, had an insatiable demand for silk, tea and porcelain. But the Chinese had no use for European products, and so no reciprocal trade occurred. Instead, the goods of the vast Chinese market could only be unlocked with cold cash.
When I watch our politicians attempt to pillory China for its artificial currency devaluation, I wonder if the reasons for our trade imbalance are not deeper. It seems to me that China, which has undergone radical and traumatic changes over the past century-and-a-half, has nevertheless retained the same attitude towards foreign imports present since the Ming and Qing dynasties. That attitude, simply put, is this: we don’t really want your stuff.
The fact is, Western countries, as well as Japan, have little to offer the Chinese that the Chinese cannot make themselves. China’s domestic market is so vast, with its population of billions, that a Chinese company catering only to domestic demand can succeed and profit on the order of a multinational conducting global trade. For each product one can think of, the Chinese have a version that makes importing that thing unnecessary. “What use have I for a Sony HD television,” a Chinese person might ask him/herself, “when I can purchase a Changhong set for a fraction of the price?” Only those at the very top of China’s bottom-heavy economic pyramid, whose conspicuous consumption of foreign brands maintains their “face,” care to revel in the Sony icons that grace their shiny new sets.
In trying to get a better understanding of how good blogs are written and organized, I have found myself reading as many first posts as possible, for it is often there that the purpose of the blog is stated, like a thesis.
I do not yet have a purpose or thesis for this blog, at least not a specific one that satisfies me. All I can say is that I recently graduated from Bard College in Asian Studies. I spent four years studying China through multiple lenses, whether it be music and culture, politics or urban planning. Although I am currently unemployed, it would be a shame not to deploy my knowledge to the best of my ability, as well as to highlight the knowledge and ideas of others.
My award winning essay on civil unrest in China: http://ubuntuone.com/p/NIN/